CHAPPY SAID
Quote:
Hellpuppy wrote:
Seems like this thread is sorta merging with the thread on partaking
I'm assuming that "partaking" is in reference to communion with the bread and wine?
I don't think that the Eucharist can be compared across the religious board as each belief seems to have its own take on it.
Some believe there is a physical transubstantiation where the bread and wine actually turn into the flesh and blood.
Some believe its a spiritual transformation.
Some limit the act only to their own church members
Some limit it to some ephemeral number of living people.
It seems that the Watchtower has made it a highly exclusive club as to who is able to recieve Holy Communion. So much that some people take part as some sort of protest.
Rituals are for groups and traditions. The motivations behind them differ from group to group.
Heck in some Prorestant churches they use cut up pieces of wonderbread and not unleavened bread but the symbol is the same.
I haven't read all the comments, but this caught my eye.
As far as the Catholic communion being different, yes the understanding on the finer details is different, but it's all based on the same idea, so it is a comparison. How its done, where it's done, by whom, varies from religion to religion.
My Protestant church used croutons!
Anyway, that is the point I was making. Yes the invitation is public, as it is for all churches, as it was for this site, but if the invitation is accepted, I just think that those that invited us should not be disregarded. As I said, I would not take communion in a Catholic Church, because this is a ritual they greatly love with rules around it and according to those rules, and in their house, I don't take it.
I went to a Protestant church that passed the bread (croutons) and wine (grape juice) once a year, but they would announce that ALL were welcome to partake regardless of faith. So no issue there.
This is a ritual with certain expectations that everyone is aware of, and if they weren't, they are carefully laid out by the speaker. It's their night and their thing. They prepare for it, they try to invite everyone, it is public, but there are still certain expectations.
I can tell you from having been a JW that when someone partakes of the emblems, it's a very big deal. It's very important to them and it is their religion. They will talk about it for months. They will feel upset that people came to protest, and they will feel disrespected. That's why it is disruptive. It was their thing, but they were targeted and their very important ritual was used to make a point.
Pup, it's a BIG deal to them. I just need to impress that on you. I hate the WTBTS, but there are some boundaries. People should be able to have their ritual in peace. There are plenty of other opportunities to protest and make statements. And we aren't talking about JW's making an internal protest, but outsiders and exmembers coming back to disrupt this ritual.