Well, if nothing else, at least we might be able to keep the discussion going (peace to you, ALL!)...
Quote:
now I guess I won't ever see them again
I don't think that's the case at all, dear Zoe (peace to you!). Indeed, I shared:
Quote:
BUT, to respond, dear tec (peace to you!) did share with us HOW JAH MIGHT resolve this problem: baby teeth. Surely, if there was a WAY to preserve those who WERE burned involuntarily or unknowingly, He would know of it... and have already made provision for it. So, again, nothing to worry ABOUT.
And...
Quote:
going from THIS point on... and letting JAH and Christ "worry" about those behind us (and find/preserve some part of them that was NOT burned)
Faith... is the
ASSURED EXPECTATION of the thing HOPED for, dear ones! I once posted as to whether it would be TRULY loving for JAH to have US living... WITHOUT those WE love. Would it be?
It was NOT my point to say all those who were burned/cremated would NOT be resurrected, not at ALL, and I SINCERELY apologize if some somehow "read" that. The POINT was twofold: first, to share the TRUTH as to what burning/cremation DOES. To help any who WISHED to to see the TRUTH about it. Now, if some wish to continue and do so personally, that is THEIR decision, yes? But they can't say no one told them what the results of such were/are. I only tried to do that. I did know that it wouldn't be well-received by some... but I never said that EVERYONE whose body was subject to burning/cremation would not be resurrected. Again, dear tec (peace!) shared with us HOW such ones COULD be.
I HATE to use this term (because any term used by the WTBTS gives me pause)... but the point was, secondly, that perhaps we
shouldn't [try to] FIND FAULT with JAH for the outcome when His warnings are not heeded... but pay attention when warnings are
given. Because we don't always know the LONG-TERM results of our choices. And we shouldn't find fault with HIM... when
others have falsified, overlooked, ignored those warnings... and/or taught US to overlook/ignore them.
Dear, dear Zoe... you "felt" it was wrong... because you were being TOLD it was! You just weren't told (by those who should have told you!)... what you were "hearing." THAT you were indeed hearing. Had you been, you might have LISTENED. So the error is not yours; you were misled... by those who TOOK THE RESPONSIBILITY (by seating themselves in the seat of Moses)... and so SHOULD have told you. They couldn't, though, because THEY don't know.
Again, each one must decide for himself/herself what they must do, dear ones... as to this and ALL things. But please don't take what I shared to even SUGGEST that everyone who was burned/cremated would... could... NOT be resurrected. Because I didn't, truly. I only shared the truth ABOUT what such does... which I didn't make up; science supports it.
But I would like to ask those of you who may have taken issue with what I shared, if you did and if you will kindly permit me:
1. What do you think "resurrection" means... and is? What is your basis?
2. What do you think will BE resurrected, if anything? What is your basis?
3. IF there is to be a resurrection of the BODY... yet, even the DNA is destroyed when a body is burned... what do you think will BE "resurrected"? From
what will it come?
4. Even to clone, one must have some DNA to work with, yes? If one is cloned from the DNA in another... is that "resurrection"? And "who" is cloned? The donor... or "someone" else? While science is working on cloning a wooly mammoth, it would STILL be a clone of the mammoth the DNA was taken FROM, yes... and not some ancestral mammoth? So, if DNA was taken from, say, dear Anne (peace to you!), as she suggested, the result would STILL be a clone of HER (or her sibling(s)) yes... and not an entirely different individual. Yes? Even if they took DNA from EVERY sibling... wouldn't the resultant "person" be a clone individual of her and/or her siblings... but NOT her father? Because in order for it to be HIM, they would need HIS DNA? Exactly his? Including the parts now missing from dear Anne's/her siblings DNA?
I am NOT trying to contend, dear ones. I am trying to understand why you might think that what I shared is... "wrong," if you do think that. Or why it's "bad".
What is most... saddening... for me... is that, right now, science denies resurrection. Cloning from old DNA, yes, but a new "entity," not the original. The MOST HOLY One of Israel, JAH of Armies... and His Son, the HOLY ONE of Israel and Holy Spirit... PROMISE resurrection. And so perhaps we should consider PROTECTING that which is to BE resurrected.
Perhaps not. Again, each one must decide for himself/herself. I just put the truth about it out there. I did know, though, that it would... mmmmmmm... disturb/concern some. I apologize for that, truly, the "disturbing", but not for sharing the truth. I am sorry, dear ones, but I can't apologize for that. I hope you (can) understand.
Again, peace to you ALL!
A slave of Christ,
Shellama