AGUEST SAID
Quote:
uote:
I do not know what you are talking about, Aguest, or why those comments were directed at me.
Oh, c'mon - sure you do, dear Chaps (peace to you!). I was talking about and directing my comment to you in relation to YOUR comments that:
Quote:
Quote:
Yep so those who chose to have communion at the Memorial may have been called to go to share their experience with those still in the system. Most likely the bulk of them just feel disrespected, possibly even persecuted.
You seemed quite clear as to who you were speaking about (and I say "seemed" because perhaps you misspoke, which is fine, but you only need say that)... which folks include me. So, I responded as to ME, due to being one of those folks. Based on YOUR comment.
Quote:
Quote:
I told Pup how I know that the bulk of JW's would react to what happened. It had nothing really to do with exJW's, or if YOU felt disrespected.
(Smile) While that might have been what you MEANT to do, dear one... and if so, again, all you need do is say that... that isn't what you DID. What you DID was refer to EX JWs as, unfortunately, your comment shows. Now true, what you posted, (i.e., "those who chose to have communion at the Memorial") COULD have included both current and/or ex JWs. However, your comment "may have been called to go to share their experience with those still in the system contradicts that and implies who you actually MEANT: exJWs. Those who are NOT "still in."
C'mon, girl. And if that's NOT who you meant, then by all means, say that ("Oh, oops, I MEANT to say..."). I... and I'm sure everyone else here, can accept that. But, I mean, if you're stickin' to what you originally posted, then... nope... what you're sayin' NOW... is NOT what you stated then. Sorry, but it's not.
Quote:
Quote:
So I don't know where you are going with that.
But, see, I think you DO. I think you know exactly what you stated... and meant to state it. I could be wrong, of course, but I don't think so, having gotten to know you as I have. See, I realize that you consider yourself to be quite... mmmmmm... clever... and while are you ARE somewhat, and I DO have great respect for you because of that... you're not really THAT clever.
You indicated who you meant, Suze: those who are NOT "still in" the system. Hence, contrary to your statement that it "really had nothing to do with exJWs," I believe the TRUTH is that it really DID. OR... you need to acknowledge that you misspoke. Which you don't seem eager to do, either. And so, this is what I mean when I (often) point out YOUR dishonesty.
Quote:
Quote:
But I definitely stand by what I said. JW's didn't look at outsiders and exmembers partaking as a light shining. For the most part, they just saw a disruption in their ritual.
Some... even most, sure, yes. And that's fine. But not all, you can trust me on that. Even so, we here know how that feels... but also that it is what it is. And so WE accept that. Again, though, THEY made the invitation. And some of us accepted. Which is something I am sure YOU can understand, yes? Taking advantage of an invitation for which you have a "sneaky feeling" isn't REALLY a genuine invitation, but, what the hey... they put it out there? YOU know what I'm sayin'... wink-wink...
Quote:
Quote:
Really not sure how my comment about them was turned around to be about you
Sure you do: because I am an exJW who chose to have communion at their Memorial. Which is who you were speaking about.
C'mon, Chaps... we all knew who you meant. Well, anyone awake and paying a modicum of attention. 'Cause you're really not THAT clever. I mean, I wish I wasn't the one who had to break it to you... but you know me: truth.
Q
Quote:
uote:
but sometimes I have a difficult time understanding your posts.
Yet, you know it doesn't have to be that way because you KNOW I am MORE than willing to explain anything you find... "difficult" TO understand. Or confusing. If nothing else, folks here know I will explain something (LOL!). YOU know this, as well. Of course, if you don't wish to GET clarification, but continue not understanding... well, then... I mean, I don't want to force ANYTHING on you... so, yes, you would have to ask. Not because I am somebody but because I'm not... and so can't read your mind. But if you WANT clarification I will certainly do what I can to help you, as such pertains to something I've posted.
Q
Quote:
uote:
So I guess I'll just assume I don't understand.
I mean, if that works for you, cool. But please don't play the "What? What did I say? I didn't mean YOU folks!" game. Because you did... and I truly believe you ARE more intelligent than THAT. I sincerely hope so. You should also consider not playing the "I just don't understand but it's not on me" game. 'Cause that one is resolvable, too.
Bottom line? Come correct with/as to me, dear one, and I'll do the same with/as to you. Actually, I'll do so regardless of what you choose to do. I prefer it as it leaves less to go back and "clean up"/apologize for later.
I hope I cleared THAT up.
Again, peace to you!
YOUR servant (yes, ma'am, I am!)... and a slave of Christ,
Shellama
Peace. Truly.
YOUR servant and a slave of Christ,
Shellama