CHARIKLO SAID
Actually, Pup,
Quote:
Quote:
All I have to make an opinion on whether or not this person is Jesus rests solely on what I see in their website.
that is not all you have to base your opinion on. By claiming that he is Jesus, and that his parner (wife?) is mary Magdalene, he is making a direct reference back to a person whom we know through the Bible, and historically through some sources unrelated to the Bible. he is grounding his claim on somehting that has external data against which his claim can be checked.
Do you find that such checking as you have been able to do gives you any confidence at all that he and Jesus are one and the same person? Or indeed that he could be?
Remembering that Jesus was the Son of God and Son of Man, as he called himself, that he called God his Father in Heaven, that the Holy Spirit came upon those assembled at Pentecost, and that Jesus himself said, as Tec reminds us, that the next time he comes no-one will know it beforehand and that everyone will be aware of it, while I am all for keeping an open mind it seems to me important also to preserve a basis of sheer common sense. (I'm also aware that had I listened to my own common sense and inner misgivings I wouldn't have landed myself in a tangle with the Jehovah's Witnesses, but that is to my eternal shame and something I just have to live with...I won't be caught like that again.)
Also, aside from his claims to be Jesus, he is talking of attaining one-ness with God. This is not a new goal for people to aspire to. This concept is common in the Eastern religions and has been a widespread strand of normal Christian thinking and teachings on prayer since the very earliiest times. You can find it in the writings of some of the Desert Fathers and in the mediaeval Christian mystics. It is a common element of much modern-day monastic thought.
To my mind, that is why you can find isolated bits of his site that sound as if they might be saying something interesting.
But really, truly, he isn't. Notice how he presents himself, hair and appearance, to look like the earliest pictorial representations of Jesus. Imagine him with a neat short back and sides hair cut in a suit. Still the same plausible guy?