Peace to you!
I just came across this and found it quite interesting. This is a study about giving cash donations (no strings attached) to some poor families in a specific village to see how that would play out (pros and cons).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... ket-newtabQuote:
Their findings are significant: Cash transfers benefited the entire local economy, not just direct recipients. As money made its way through the area, both families who did and did not receive cash ended up substantially better off.
Just as importantly, they could find little in the way of adverse effects from the experiment, either in villages that got the cash or in those that didn’t. Spending on temptation goods — such as cigarettes, alcohol and gambling — did not increase. People didn’t work less. Rates of domestic violence didn’t change, nor did more children drop out of school. Local income inequality levels did not change. And contrary to a common fear, the program had minimal effect on prices: Inflation increased less than 1 percent over and above Kenya’s overall rate.
I know there are many programs out there to help those in need, and I am not knocking any charities that collect donations and gives
things to those in need (building schools, food, supplies, etc). But there can be corruption in those AND they must take a portion of the donations they receive to keep themselves up and running, pay employees, etc. Seems to me that this would cut all that out. I am also not knocking being poor (in material things), because poverty does not mean that people are not happy, do not have love, etc. In fact, the poor (material poor) can be rich in love and happiness, and certainly in faith and spirit - more so than many who are rich (materially rich).
But I came across that article this morning and found it interesting. Wanted to share.
Peace and love to you all, and to your households,
your sister and servant and fellow slave of Christ,
tammy