xjwsforChrist

Non-Religious Christian Spirituality
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 5:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:12 pm
Posts: 1523
I hear the Pentecostals speak in tongues sometimes. What is the purpose of that?
Also isn't that kind of like a spirit taking over your body if you don't know a different language?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:17 pm
Posts: 767
My understanding is that speaking in tongues is simply speaking in another language when one does know know that language. The spirit is responsible for imparting the ability to do so.

The greek work for tongues is glōssais (Strong's 1100) and means "the tongue, a language, nation"

The gift is useless if people listening cannot understand, which is also why there is the gift of translation (see 1 Cor 12:8-10).

Pentacostals are (in)famous for speaking in tongues. It's one demonination where that's fairly common. However, unless anyone can understand it, what's the point?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:12 pm
Posts: 1523
Yes I was thinking the same......what is the point? Showy display?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:17 pm
Posts: 767
Code:
what is the point? Showy display?

Paul indicated that might be the case:

The one who speaks in a tongue builds up himself, but the one who prophesies builds up a congregation. Now I would like for all of you to speak in tongues, but I prefer that you prophesy. Indeed, the one who prophesies is greater than the one who speaks in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the congregation may be built up. But at this time, brothers, if I should come speaking to you in tongues, what good would I do you unless I spoke to you either with a revelation or with knowledge or with a prophecy or with a teaching? - 1 Cor 14:4-6


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:40 pm
Posts: 714
I was thinking that speaking in tongues was speaking so that people of several different languages could all understand it at the same time.

And yes, what would be the point if you weren't going to tell them something they DIDN'T already know?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3403
Speaking in tongues is a gift of the Spirit. On the day of Pentecost (where the pentacostals must take their name), the disciples were given holy spirit, and the Spirit enabled them to speak in tongues. (other languages) AT that time, though, there were people (God-fearing Jews - acts 2:5) gathered around who heard the disciples speaking in their various native tongues, and so could understand them.

So there was a purpose... even if that was also as a sign to those who could understand the disciples (now anointed and so Christians), who were now speaking in their languages.

Read Acts, chapter 2.


Not sure if a pentacostal has ever been given the gift to speak in other languages... real languages that other people speak, that is. They just claim that they are speaking in the language of angels or something, don't they? And they also do not understand what they are saying? Nor does anyone around them understand? I don't know enough about them to know what they claim, actually, lol.

But the gift of tongues came with being anointed with holy spirit; and that gift of the holy spirit is the gift that Christ promised. (Acts 1:8, Acts 2:17)


Peace to you,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:40 pm
Posts: 714
Quote:
Not sure if a pentacostal has ever been given the gift to speak in other languages... real languages that other people speak, that is


See, that's what I mean; I have somehow gotten the idea that what was spoken by holy spirit was not a 'real' language; but when those sounds were made, each one heard it in their own language simultaneously.

I think that might be why when a Pentecostal speaks in 'tongues' it just sounds like made-up gibberish.

When I was a teen, a group from my church visited a Pentecostal church. Before the night was over a woman stood up and started that stuff. While she was 'speaking' all the church members put their heads down like they were really trying to concentrate. When some saw we weren't following suit, they gave us mean looks. (Hey, how did they know - they were supposed to be concentrating - lol) So when that was finally over, an interpreter stood up and told us what was said. I don't even remember it, because it was so banal, and short - it sure takes a long time to say basically nothing in 'tongues'.

Anyway, I was creeped out and never ever wanted to go back there.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3403
Quote:
See, that's what I mean; I have somehow gotten the idea that what was spoken by holy spirit was not a 'real' language; but when those sounds were made, each one heard it in their own language simultaneously.


It reads a bit like that doesn't it? Because that is what I always thought too. Sort of like the babble-fish from hitchhikers guide to the galaxy ; )

But wouldn't that mean then that the gift would have been given to the people hearing, rather than the people speaking, who'd just had holy spirit poured out upon them?



Peace!
your sister, servant, and a slave of Christ,
tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 5:09 pm
Posts: 680
Speaking in tongues? They never do. So me one who does. Why don't they record it and use google translate? Because they don't speak in tongues.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5133
Doing a little "happy" dance... and LOVING this discussion between you dear ones (peace to you, all!).

Nothing to add 'cause you've all said it all!

Peace to you!

YSSFS of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:41 am
Posts: 706
It is clear in ACTS that the gift of tongues was the ability to speak another language that one had no prior ability to do so before the gift from Our Lord.
It seemed to some as gibberish or "drunken" because they didn't know the languages BUT it was clear to those that knew the foreign language.
Pentecostals speak gibberish, they do NOT speak and recognizable language.

Now, it may be the some MAY be given the gift to speak the language of the angels ( Fallen and demons as well) BUT there is no evidence of that.

One of the sure signs of possession ( as opposed to mental illness) by the way, is the ability to speak a language that a person has never be taught, typically it is a "dead language" like Aramaic or even "angel speak".

Which is NOT what we are discussing here of course.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:17 pm
Posts: 767
Which brings up a good question. JWs say that all these gifts no longer apply because of Paul's words at 1 Cor 13:8: "But if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away with; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away with."

Frankly, I don't understand what Paul was trying to say here. He follows up with: "For we have partial knowledge and we prophesy partially, but when what is complete comes, what is partial will be done away with. When I was a child, I used to speak as a child, to think as a child, to reason as a child; but now that I have become a man, I have done away with the traits of a child. For now we see in hazy outline by means of a metal mirror, but then it will be face-to-face. At present I know partially, but then I will know accurately, just as I am accurately known. Now, however, these three remain: faith, hope, love; but the greatest of these is love."

I guess my question is: are JWs right in their interpretation here? I don't personally think so, but I don't quite understand the partial/complete stuff Paul was talking about.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5133
Quote:
One of the sure signs of possession ( as opposed to mental illness) by the way, is the ability to speak a language that a person has never be taught, typically it is a "dead language" like Aramaic or even "angel speak".


Very interesting, dear P (mornin' and peace to you!). I'm not sure, but you may have been misled, if this is what you believe. I say that because I once had an experience related to tongues. I don't think I was possessed, at least not in the way most consider that word - taken over by a "demon"/bad spirit. I WAS filled with holy spirit and guided by my Lord, though, and that, too, is a possession, so.... I posted about it on JWN (or maybe H20... or New Light), many years ago. Here is the gist of what I shared:

I had gone with another professed Body member to Las Vegas to meet her cousin (who lived there). That cousin was at the beginning stages of seeking Christ and had met a group of ladies who claimed to possess holy spirit (I am not commenting as to whether they did or didn't - that's not the point of this sharing). I was ecstatic because I thought, "Yay! The more (of us) the merrier!" and so I was eager to meet them.

We went to an (older) lady's apartment where one initial thing that occurred began to make me feel at home: I suggested we wash feet and all agreed! Okay, starting to "feel" like I'm among "brethren." But then, the lady took out some vials of oil and said we needed to "anoint" one another. (Ummmm... my Lord's never told me about/to do that, ma'am... but, okay, let's see where all of this goes...).

So we chatted a bit, and then the lady began to pray. Now, others praying "publicly" makes me a bit nervous. What I received from my dear Lord is that we are to pray in private. Give thanks publicly, absolutely. Pray out loud in front of others, i.e., publicly, not so much. Unless, of course, you're praying FOR someone (i.e., someone ill, infirm, in some kind of physical need, etc.). But, again, I was a guest, so... her house, her rules.

Just after the start of the prayer, though, the Vegas cousin began to "speak". And in a language NONE of US understood. And as she spoke... she began to cry softly. She spoke somewhat quietly, not raucously, etc., and cried quietly (tears streamed). Her eyes were closed. We all kind of looked at one another, in wonder (not judgment or fear)... and then... all of a sudden I could understand... VERY clearly... EXACTLY what she was saying. And... it was in ancient Aramaic. And... it was my dear Lord speaking "through" her. And... he was utterly distressed over "Israel."

His words were, in effect, asking "Israel" why they had abandoned him, why, when he loved them SO much, even to give his life for them, why they continually pursued other gods who did not know them or care for them, who could not help them... why they kept rejected him... when he loved them SO much... why wouldn't they come, return to him... and relieve their suffering and pain? He started off asking that, almost BEGGING-like, and with GREAT sadness and pain. I could FEEL the heart pain... and so understood why she was crying - HE was crying... for "Israel." "He" then began to cry because, as "he" said, "They didn't know what was in store for them, what awaited them, what 'he' wanted to save them FROM."

At first, I did not understand what he meant by "Israel" (he pronounced it "Jah'ish'ra'El")... but while "he" was speaking I came to understand it to mean "Man who contends with JAH as the TRUE God", or "who fights against JAH as the TRUE God", so I understood the Hebrew term "Y'sra'el" from that point...). Not meaning they fight against JAH Himself, per se (although it does mean that), but the words meant more like contending with/fighting against JAH... AS the True God. By means of their seeking, having, following OTHER gods.

As "he" spoke, I had the privilege of interpreting the words. And I will tell you, "his" pain... broke my heart!! I don't think I've ever heard such pleading, such admonition, such... love. And so, such heartbreak. He said he would do what he did all over again, every step, if "Israel" would just return to him, that he regretted nothing. There was NOTHING bad in what he said. EVERYTHING he said you could KNOW came from a place of love.

When "he" was done speaking... she "woke up." I say woke up... because SHE had NO idea as to what had just happened!! She was not sad, or tearful, didn't understand why she had been crying. THAT she had been crying. She said she had just pretty much been "listening to the prayer." But the prayer had stopped... when SHE began to speak.

I do not speak Aramaic, at all, dear one. Nor can I say I understand it if someone were to speak it to me NOW. But I absolutely understood it that day, and understood that it WAS (ancient) Aramaic. And I can honestly say I was not "possessed," at least, not in the way some teach "possession" is. Nothing and no one "took over" me. I was used, yes, but not unwillingly.

Was SHE possessed? I think I can say yes, she was... but not in a bad way, not at ALL. She didn't scream or curse or float... or throw herself down... or faint. There was no frost/freezing air... smoke... foul odor... apparitions... specters... haunting voices... spinning heads... NOTHING that one might think of when thinking of someone being "possessed" (by a spirit)... as perhaps the movies... and religion... have led us to believe. Quite the opposite: she was calm and quiet the entire time, albeit crying (but again, quietly). There was no "outcry", no harsh words, no cursing. Nothing but simple, heartfelt and heart-wrenching pleading for "Israel" to return and stop rejecting (him)... and so find peace for themselves. I would say she certainly WAS "taken-over," but there was NOTHING bad... or frightening... about the event.

And it all took less than 5-6 minutes. When we were done, the only ones at the table who seemed surprised was the lady who "spoke" and her cousin who had taken me to Vegas to meet her. When we discussed it, briefly, afterward, the lady said she had never had anything like that happen to her and, again, she didn't even remember it. So, I told HER what she had "said."

We all left rejoicing that day because "something" so unusual had occurred... and was faith-building for us ALL. Not running through the streets trying to make converts, though. Well, I didn't. I am not sure what the others did. I think I remember the host and other ladies heading for a revival of some kind. Soon after that, the lady who took me to Vegas, her cousin, and I all went separate ways... physically and spiritually. Apparently, they met a charismatic preacher who proclaimed that speaking in "tongues," the unintelligible kind some of you have mentioned here, was a literal REQUIREMENT, because speaking in "tongues" was the ONLY proof of one having God's holy spirit! And while I tried to explain that, yes, it is ONE manifestation... but not one given ME (not speaking; I was granted to interpret, but only that one time. That day, none of US spoke Aramaic, and so I was granted the [one-time] "gift" of interpreting what was being said at THAT time)... they weren't able to accept that.

But it is NOT mere gibberish; it is actual language that others can understand. The preacher-man, however, apparently was a proponent of the kind of "tongues" you all have brought up here, that which is a cacophony of unintelligible sounds and words (that some like to CLAIM is the "tongue of angels." It is NOT. Paul didn't MEAN that we COULD speak in the tongue of angels - why WOULD we, unless we were speaking TO angels??? - but that even if we DID, if we didn't have LOVE there would be no POINT!).

Unfortunately, the Vegas experience had an affect on the lady who was used to "speak" that in her pursuit for more experiences she was captivated by this man, and so began to follow him, she and the one who took me to Vegas. Captivated... until, my understanding is, things began leading to some inappropriateness. Praise JAH, I think she saw THEN that his motive wasn't pure; unfortunately, that left them both floundering, spiritually, and running from religion to religion trying to find AGAIN what they had at the first. I am not sure whether they have, though, either of them, to this date. And this was about 13-14 years ago.

My point, though, is that I think we, who ARE of the Body, should be careful when (perhaps unknowingly) attributing a "bad" connotation to someone being able to speak a "dead" language. By that, I mean, the term "possession" is usually mean to convey an UNDESIRABLE situation; however, that is not always the case. True, one can be possessed by a bad spirit; however, if JAH and Christ actually DO come and "dwell" in one... that, too, is a "possession." Particularly if the one has given themselves OVER... TO JAH and Christ... to be USED by these. One has, then, GRANTED to them possession (of one's own vessel)... to be used for THEIR will.

But I am also directed to share with you (all) that ancient Aramaic is actually NOT a "dead" language. JAH is the God of the LIVING... and Christ LIVES... and it is the tongue they often use when speaking to the sons of man (although WE are given "ears" to hear as such words would interpret into our OWN language/tongue). Since THEY are not dead, though, neither is the (earthly) language they use. Thus, my Lord directs me to share with you that there is one who WISHES man to BELIEVE that that "tongue"... Aramaic... is dead... JUST as he wishes man to believe the Ones who USE it are (dead). Because he does not want man to LISTEN... so as to HEAR them SPEAK... and perhaps be SAVED! Hence, he has his "agents" LIE... and TEACH lies... as to these things! Not just that the language is dead, but that JAH and Christ are, as well. Because, remember, it is the dead... WHO DO NOT SPEAK.

But what he and his agents teach IS NOT TRUE! The MOST HOLY One of Israel, JAH of Armies, and His Son, the HOLY ONE of Israel and Holy Spirit, JAHESHUA, the Chosen One of JAH (MischaJah)... are ALIVE. And... they SPEAK. And... sometimes... often... they speak... in Aramaic.

Being able to speak in ancient Aramaic, then... and even more, to UNDERSTAND and INTERPRET what is being said... CAN be a privilege, dear one, and not a "curse." And so, WE, the BODY of Christ, must be VERY careful that WE are not misled... into saying that what is GOOD... is bad!

As always, peace to you... and I hope this helps, truly!

YSSFS of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3403
Quote:
I guess my question is: are JWs right in their interpretation here? I don't personally think so, but I don't quite understand the partial/complete stuff Paul was talking about.



Partial... refers to now... since Christ has not yet returned to gather those who belong to Him, given them white robes (spirit bodies) and established His Kingdom.
Complete... refers to when Christ returns and we are caught up to Him and changed (given white robes/spirit bodies), and the Kingdom established.


So no, the jws are not right in their interpretation... nor are any others who claim that we don't have gifts of the spirit, nor does the Spirit speak... because now we have the bible instead. I mean, the first time i heard that, I was like... 'So... people used to be able to hear the Spirit... a LIVING voice, from the LIVING Spirit/Christ... but today we get a book (that is not error-free) instead and that is supposed to be considered a step up? Something is wrong with that reasoning, lol!"

Who in the world would want a book... OVER... the living Christ?

Just because someone (who does not hear or have faith TO hear) decides to call the bible the living word, does not mean that it actually becomes such or that it replaces Christ, as the TRUE Living Word and Truth of God.



Peace to you Leaving,
your sister, and servant, and a slave of Christ,
tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3403
That was beautiful, Shelby, thank you for sharing what happened that day. I am sad for the woman who lost what she had at first, and hope that she is able to listen, and follow our Lord's voice back to Him.

Peace and love to you,
your sister, and servant, and fellow slave of Christ,
tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group