xjwsforChrist
https://www.xjwsforchrist.com/

Bible books and issues of violence
https://www.xjwsforchrist.com/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=578
Page 1 of 2

Author:  kassad84 [ Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Bible books and issues of violence

What particular bible books do you normally read? I am currently trying to read through the bible again and I am finding it hard to finish books that featured violence, genocides, etc. Some even appears to be instructed by God himself. Books such as Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, 1 and 2 Kings, 1 and 2 Chronicles - appears to report massive genocides, slavery of Amalekites, Moabites, etc, man, woman and children. Hitler himself might have easily used these scriptures for his own purposes. Now, I tended to skip these parts as it weakens me and the records doesn't seem to serve any kind of purpose in strengthening one's spirituality or relationship with God. I'm still struggling on this part of the OT why it has been placed there.

In your experiences, do you find it beneficial to just focus on the New testament writings or do you think it's critical to still consider the OT writings as well, although there are parts that seems to be stumbling blocks? I do think the writings of the Prophets are just as important as it occasionally referred to in the NT. What are your thoughts/views/approach regarding these writings?

Author:  Justmom [ Wed Apr 17, 2013 9:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

Hello dear Kassad...

What has helped me to understand the bible as a whole IS in looking to CHRIST NOW...
He is the exact representation of His father Jah. I try to always focus on all the accounts that show us how and what kind of person he was. This way we can truly know what kind of Heavenly Father we have. If Jah " IS love", and CHRIST is the perfect reflection of HIM....then if I cannot see CHRIST doing, saying, acting, or being of this nature, then I cannot see the father in it either.

Remember the bible has been tampered with as there is the warning of the false stylus 's and those that twist the scriptures to their own understanding in order to create a perfect environment to enslave and instill fear in people therefore controlling them.
Our adversary wants nothing more than to make us believe that Jah is a vengeful, merciLESS, cruel, violent god, who pleasures himself in watching mankind suffer when in fact Jah is the COMPLETE opposite. He is " slow to anger", he is merciful, compassionate and does not desire ANY to be destroyed but that ALL attain to repentance. 2 Peter 3:9

When in doubt, look to CHRIST. Then you will know exactly what kind of a father we have.
If you are a parent, it should explain pretty well how much love we have for our children and it cannot even come close to Jahs love for us.

Anything else written to the contrary has been added, mistranslated, or twisted so people either fear god, or do not believe in him at all therefore the adversary has succeeded in his mission.

Just a thought
Love Justmom :mrgreen:

Author:  PSacramento [ Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

May I suggest the following:

http://www.amazon.com/Sacred-Word-Broke ... ton+sparks
http://www.amazon.com/Gods-Word-Human-W ... ton+sparks
http://www.amazon.com/God-Moral-Monster ... paul+copan


They can help you to understand the issues you have found.

Author:  AGuest [ Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

I don't really read the Bible, dear Kassad (good morning, and peace to you!) because (1) it is NOT one continuing book, but a compilation of many books, which include but is not entirely comprised of "scripture"... and (2) it is not the Word of God, as many tout it to be. That Word is Christ; he alone is the One and ONLY Word of God. John 1:1, 14; Revelation 19:13; John 17:17; 14:6; Hebrews 13:12

So I don't really put too much credence in what the Bible, as a WHOLE, as to say about God (the MOST HOLY One of Israel, JAH of Armies - Psalm 68:4). For that, I go to His Word, my Lord, the HOLY One of Israel, JAHESHUA, the Chosen One of JAH (MischaJah).

That said, I do REFER to the Bible... when I am sharing truth with others who I know still walk by sight and so need to see certain things "in writing." They are not yet able to HEAR the truth... FROM the Truth... and so, like the noble-minded Bereoans, need to look things up. And I'm okay with that: it helped me to do so, at one point, too.

For the most part, when I read various scriptures and verses it is only to be certain that I am quoting them accurately or using the "right" one when sharing the context of what my Lord shared with ME with others. Other than that, it really is just a book compiled of many books, histories, records, chronologies, letters, accounts... and some scripture.

When I DO read the Bible, though... and I do for things like comfort, when my spirit is... I dunno... feeling "down"... I read the Psalms. I ask my Lord which Psalm will express what my spirit is "feeling" or needing... and then I go to whichever one he tells me. And always, ALWAYS... the words are EXACTLY what I wanted to say or needed to "hear." Always.

There is one verse or so that resounds with me, though, that might help you see what I mean when I say I don't need the Bible or personally read it much. It's John 5:39, 40, where, in speaking to a group of people who lacked faith in him, Christ was recorded to have said:

"You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me. But you are not willing to come to Me that you may have life."

What he meant was that eternal life cannot be found IN the scriptures or had by reading them. It can only come from him. Yet, those he was speaking to would not come to him. He spoke of them further:

“I do not receive honor from men. But I know you, that you do not have the love of God in you."

Why did he say this to them? He explains:

I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive. How can you believe, who receive honor from one another, and do not seek the honor that comes from the only God?"

He told them the truth here, that they would READILY follow someone who came in their own name, including him, had he done so, but not someone who came in the name of God, which he did. It was for that very reason that they rejected him. NOT because what he said was not TRUE... or because what he did was not GOOD... but because he came in the Father's name: JaHVeH. JAH... who breathes armies (of spirits) into existence. Psalm 68:4

BUT... he did not judge or condemn them for their lack of faith... in God... AND in him. He didn't have to. As he said:

"Do not think that I shall accuse you to the Father; there is one who accuses you—Moses, in whom you trust. For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote about Me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?”

He didn't have to judge them; they judged themselves. As ALL of mankind judge themselves. By their own works... by their own words... and by their LACK of faith in the One sent to save them, the HOLY One of Israel, JAHESHUA, the Chosen One of JAH (MischaJah)... who is the MOST HOLY One of Israel, and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Such ones believe in the words written as to/ABOUT Christ... but not IN Christ himself. If they did, they would have listened to HIM... rather than continually going back to Moses. And even in doing that, they weren't listening to Moses because, as my Lord said, HE is the One Moses wrote ABOUT... that MOSES said they should listen to when he arrived.

I hope this helps and, again, peace to you!

YOUR servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellama

Author:  kassad84 [ Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

justmom, thanks, it seems we always need to consider Christ's spirit even in the scriptures themselves! reminds me again of that admonition "Don't believe every spirit..."

Paul, i'll definitely read those books, thanks!

Aguest, thanks for your thoughts on this, I do have a question though, you have said:

For that, I go to His Word, my Lord, the HOLY One of Israel, JAHESHUA, the Chosen One of JAH (MischaJah).

Now, I'm a little bit perplexed :D , my understanding of that is to pray for guidance and go to NT and meditate on the accounts and life of Jesus and the apostles, and try our best to live by them. Is that what you meant by this? Thanks. Interestingly, I've read the same thought from a book (George MacDonald) about not relying on the Bible so much, e.g. not relying on the "letter" because it tends toward legalism, but rather we should rely on the Spirit. I guess I'm still a spiritual babe as I don't really know how to do that without consulting the Bible.

Author:  AGuest [ Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

Quote:
Is that what you meant by this? Thanks


No, dear one (again, peace to you!). I mean go directly to the Word, Christ (John 5:39, 40). There is nothing and no one else between you and God. Nothing. And NO ONE.

Peace!

YOUR servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellama

Author:  kassad84 [ Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

hmmm..i guess I'll need to ask more wisdom and reflect further on this, thanks Shel...! :)

Author:  tec [ Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

I also do not read the bible anymore. I will look up a verse sometimes. Sometimes if I need to see something for myself... though I am learning to rely solely upon Christ to teach and guide me in spirit, and I did set aside my bible for a long time so as to take away that 'crutch', that can sometimes stand between us and Christ. (like you said, there are things that are written that weaken your faith). When I stopped studying with the jws, I started listening... I did not know I could hear Christ... but I could feel hope and love from Him and His Father. Then I went back and decided to read some of the bible, and that love and hope faded... because much of some of what is written does not seem to be of love or hope (depending upon what glasses one is using to read what is written. As Justmom shared... if one is reading through Christ - meaning testing everything against Him - then one will be able to see with 'better eyes') I had to set the bible aside until I grew more confident in that love and hope, and put my faith in that which I was receiving from Christ. Then, when I went and read the bible, things written within it did not disturb me so much. I could see a bit better... I had been given a bit better eyes. I could see that some things in the OT are there because the people did not know better... (and/or because the scribes copying the written words down did not understand or know better; or simply changed things). I could see that it is Christ who is the Truth, and if something is in conflict with Him, then IT is NOT the truth. I also found the scripture that speaks of the lying pen of the scribes.

It took me a little longer to realize that I did not need the bible at all- at least not for myself, though I will look something up when trying to show someone else something who might need to see it for themselves. No blame or judgment from me for those who need/want to do that. I needed to do it also, and occasionally I will still look something up, rather than going to Christ and asking Him as I know that I should and CAN. But Christ is Spirit. Alive, speaking, communicating, guiding, teaching... and He does not need the bible to do this. Using the bible can work against faith, if one depends up on it - a tool of sight - rather than upon Christ, the Holy Spirit, to teach and guide us. Because hearing Him is not as easy as seeing something written - at least not at first - and most of us need the 'training wheels' before we learn to ride on two wheels. But at some point, you got to take those training wheels off, and go to Christ in spirit and in truth.

Someone said something from our group a while back... i think it might have been Quentin or Vander (sorry I can't remember, and i'm about to paraphrase; probably badly, lol) : At some point you need to stop reading the menu, and eat.


Kassad, there are a few tests that might help you with your uncertainty in understanding what might be true in what is written (though even inspired expressions are to be tested), in order:

1) Test against Christ (who IS the Truth), meaning go to Him and ask Him as to the truth of something. (Now if you are not yet able to hear Him - though if you wish to hear him, then continue to knock and ask for your ears to be opened, so as to have ears that hear - then see test # 3)

2) Test against Love. (God is love. Christ is love. They do not act from a place other then love)

3) Test against what Christ is written to have said, done, taught. (Because Christ is the Truth, Image, Word of God. Not the bible; not even the scriptures. So if you need/want to go by what is written, then go by what is written in accordance with Him. If there is a conflict, then either it did not happen as written, or you are misunderstanding what IS written)

Hope that helps some.

Peace and love to you,
tammy

Author:  AGuest [ Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

Christ is the Truth, Image, Word of God. Not the bible; not even the scriptures. So if you need/want to go by what is written, then go by what is written in accordance with Him. If there is a conflict, then either it did not happen as written, or you are misunderstanding what IS written)

Yes, dear tec (peace to you, luv!)... OR they didn't (fully) know or understand him... OR hadn't left off the "baggage" of their previous worship. Such as with Paul (formerly the Pharisee, Saul of Tarsus), who wrote many things in opposition to what our dear Lord said and taught, which caused him "problems" with the Apostles and older men. Which is why it is SO important to test what is written against Christ... and not "the Bible", per se. Along with the false pen teachings of the scribes as set out in the OT, Paul's teachings are also responsible for a LOT of the "bad conduct" of "christians." More so, actually, as many dismiss the OT but follow "Paul" to a "T". Or think they do (some of what is attributed to him was not even written by him, was "added" to by those who wrote FOR him when he was blind, or has been "tampered" with by modern scribes who don't understand what God, Christ, and the kingdom TRULY is all about).

Of course, Paul also moved PAST what some of the Apostles and older men knew and understood, at some point, because he eventually LEARNED to listen to and by guided by holy spirit. But early on, he often taught of his own understanding, NOT holy spirit. And he even stated that (probably even more than we have in writing). So one must take care: God said to listen to His SON (Matthew 17:5)... not to Paul, Timothy, Matthew, Luke, John, the Pope, the GB... Shelby... or anyone else. Christ did say that those who received those he sent also received him. But such ones must bring the SAME message. Otherwise, they are false "christs" and false prophets.

Please let us know if you need further assistance, dear Kassad (peace to you, as well!)... for which you are unable to ask about directly.

Peace to you, both!

Your servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellama

Author:  tec [ Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

Yes to all.

Because even in the NT, there are things written that seem to be or are in conflict with what Christ taught (as are the extrapolations that people make from some words that they do not understand; such as shunning and df'ing; where if they were listening to Christ... NOWHERE... does he ever state that those who belong to him are to shun anyone; but He does warn that those who belong to Him will be tossed out and/or persecuted. If they were actually listening to Paul, they would see that he recanted his call for the Corinthians to shun that one brother for his sin - a sexual sin that is grievous in the laws of the OT - and so to Paul who still had the baggage of that law, it would have been some 'cognitive dissonance' for him perhaps between the grace and forgiveness of Christ... and the more familiar -to Paul- punishment/condemnation for having broken a law)

Listen to Christ first and foremost.

Peace,
tammy

Author:  PSacramento [ Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

The issue of the sexually immoral brother in Corinth really gets abused a lot.
The simple fact is Paul was suggesting a course of action to make it clear to the perpetrator, how severe his sin was.
And it was a biggie and a unrepentant one at that.
Look at what Paul wrote ( and remember Paul's description of Love and how much it must have hurt him to write this):
Quote:
5 It is actually reported that there is immorality among you, and immorality of such a kind as does not exist even among the Gentiles, that someone has his father’s wife. 2 [a]You have become [b]arrogant and [c]have not mourned instead, so that the one who had done this deed would be removed from your midst.

3 For I, on my part, though absent in body but present in spirit, have already judged him who has so committed this, as though I were present. 4 In the name of our Lord Jesus, when you are assembled, and [d]I with you in spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 I have decided to deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of his flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord [e]Jesus.

6 Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump of dough? 7 Clean out the old leaven so that you may be a new lump, just as you are in fact unleavened. For Christ our Passover also has been sacrificed. 8 Therefore let us celebrate the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

9 I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; 10 I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world. 11 But [f]actually, I wrote to you not to associate [g]with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12 For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13 But those who are outside, God [h]judges. Remove the wicked man from among yourselves.


Paul was dealing with an unrepentant sinner that was was being accepted and "contaminating" the congregation ( one wonders the issues that were arsing because of his actions being "condoned") so Paul believed that in "delivering him to Satan" that he would be, ultimately saved.
The Corinth congregation was boasting and yet had this man in their mist and, in Paul's view, a statement had to be made for THEM and the sinner to ultimately be saved.
And in the end, as we see in his second letter, the man repented and Paul told them to take him back, even stating that he felt bad that he had suggested removing him in the first place, even though the course of action did work.

Quote:
Reaffirm Your Love

2 But I determined this [a]for my own sake, that I would not come to you in sorrow again. 2 For if I cause you sorrow, who then makes me glad but the one whom I made sorrowful? 3 This is the very thing I wrote you, so that when I came, I would not have sorrow from those who ought to make me rejoice; having confidence in you all that my joy would be the joy of you all. 4 For out of much affliction and anguish of heart I wrote to you with many tears; not so that you would be made sorrowful, but that you might know the love which I have especially for you.

5 But if any has caused sorrow, he has caused sorrow not to me, but in some degree—[b]in order not to say too much—to all of you. 6 Sufficient for such a one is this punishment which was inflicted by the majority, 7 so that on the contrary you should rather forgive and comfort him, otherwise such a one might be overwhelmed by excessive sorrow. 8 Wherefore I urge you to reaffirm your love for him. 9 For to this end also I wrote, so that I might [c]put you to the test, whether you are obedient in all things. 10 But one whom you forgive anything, I forgive also; for indeed what I have forgiven, if I have forgiven anything, I did it for your sakes in the presence of Christ, 11 so that no advantage would be taken of us by Satan, for we are not ignorant of his schemes.

Author:  AGuest [ Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

(Disclaimer: long(er) post) -

The issue in the Corinthian congregation was not man's sin OR repentance, though (peace to you all!). It was Paul 's teaching to judge... which overstepped the commandment of Christ to STOP judging. In the verses following what our dear PSacto (the greatest of love and peace to you, dear one!) quoted, Paul went on to say:

"What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13 God will judge those outside. “Expel the wicked person from among you[/b].” 1 Corinthians 5:12, 13

Paul was relying on his Pharisaical education and so his position was from the Law. Deuteronomy 13:5; 17:7; 19:19; 21:21; 22:21,24; 24:7 This is because he had not yet learn to walk by spirit himself... but was still "under" the Law. And so, he was trying to put those who had been RELEASED from the Law... BY Christ (based on his death!) BACK under Law. This caused many of the Corinthians, and some of the Apostles, to have a problem with Paul. THEY had learned, from Christ, to follow THIS "pattern":

“If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector. Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." Matthew 18:15-18

Apparently, the Corinthians HAD followed this pattern (because, after giving them HIS "commandment," Paul LATER wrote:

"Sufficient for such a one is this punishment which was inflicted by the majority..." 2 Corinthians 2:6

But that is not what he had tried to get them to do at FIRST. At first, he tried to get them to adhere to the Law, which again, they had been released from. PAUL was the one still "walking by sight," and did for some time (which is why he told Timothy the whole "all scripture is inspired and beneficial for teaching," etc. thing... rather than telling Timothy to go to Christ and rely on HIM and holy spirit - Paul was not relying on either, himself).

Paul was still a victim of his own arrogance and education, which fomented in him a need to control... which was conducive to his training as a Pharisee: he had the mindset. He had a LOT to learn when he was chosen by Christ, however, and learned much of it by means of the SUFFERING he endured for that One. Which is why he was chosen: NOT his "zeal" but so as to take the place in suffering of he CAUSED to suffer for Christ. He was instrumental in stopping the work of others, particularly Stephen, and so he had to take Stephen's place, including his suffering:

"When the members of the Sanhedrin heard this, they were furious and gnashed their teeth at him. But Stephen, full of the Holy Spirit, looked up to heaven and saw the glory of God, and [Jesus] standing at the right hand of God. “Look,” he said, “I see heaven open and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.”

"At this they covered their ears and, yelling at the top of their voices, they all rushed at him, dragged him out of the city and began to stone him. Meanwhile, the witnesses laid their coats at the feet of a young man named Saul. While they were stoning him, Stephen prayed, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” Then he fell on his knees and cried out, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” When he had said this, he fell asleep.

"Saul approved of their killing him.

"On that day a great persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria. Godly men buried Stephen and mourned deeply for him. But Saul began to destroy the church. Going from house to house, he dragged off both men and women and put them in prison.

...

"Meanwhile, Saul was still breathing out murderous threats against the Lord’s disciples. He went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues in Damascus, so that if he found any there who belonged to the Way, whether men or women, he might take them as prisoners to Jerusalem. 3 As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him.

"He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?”

“Who are you, Lord?” Saul asked.

“I am [Jesus], whom you are persecuting,” he replied. “Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”

"The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So they led him by the hand into Damascus. For three days he was blind, and did not eat or drink anything.

"In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord called to him in a vision, “Ananias!

“Yes, Lord,” he answered.

"The Lord told him, “Go to the house of Judas on Straight Street and ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying. 12 In a vision he has seen a man named Ananias come and place his hands on him to restore his sight.”

“Lord,” Ananias answered, “I have heard many reports about this man and all the harm he has done to your holy people in Jerusalem. And he has come here with authority from the chief priests to arrest all who call on your name.”

But the Lord said to Ananias, “Go! This man is my chosen instrument to proclaim my name to the Gentiles and their kings and to the people of Israel.
I will show him how much he must suffer for my name."

Acts 7:54-59; 8:1, 2; 9:1-15

Praise JAH that given the "authority" he wielded, Paul DID change his position. He finally "got it". Why? Because he eventually had to share his message with both Jews/Israel AND non-Israelite Gentiles. His message to the Corinthians was primarily to Jews/Israel... and we can know this because the non-Israelite Gentiles weren't UNDER the very Law Paul was trying to get the Corinthians to adhere to! Once he LEARNED to follow Christ and NOT the Law, Paul wrote that he did to the Romans about a year later, which "congregation" consisted of both Jews and non-Jews (Romans 1:1, 7; 11:13[/b]:

"But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God. For it is written:

“As I live, says JaHVeH,
Every knee shall bow to Me,
And every tongue shall confess to God.”

"So then each of us shall give account of himself to God. Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother’s way."
Romans 14:10-13

UNFORTUNATELY, those who look to PAUL (versus AT Christ) don't "see" the spiritual progression or result maturity and change IN Paul that he experienced. The fact that the Bible books are not canonized in order contributes largely to this, but the primary reason that folks can't see this truth is pursuant to something Paul himself wrote in his second letter:

"Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts!

"Therefore, since we have such a hope, we are very bold. We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to prevent the Israelites from seeing the end of what was passing away. But their minds were made dull,
to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away." 2 Corinthians 3:7-16

Unfortunately, the account doesn't show that Paul elaborated on HIS previous error of trying to put the Corinthians back under Law.

This very situation, however, is one reason why relying "on the Bible," and so what we see with our eyes (what is "written") can be a dangerous thing. It shows why SO many are caught up in judging... and so putting others back under Law... due to trying to be the means for "cleansing" congregations/the Body of Christ... rather than relying on GOD to cleanse that Body... THROUGH Christ:

I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener. He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes so that it will be even more fruitful. You are already clean because of the word I have spoken to you. Remain in me, as I also remain in you. [b][u]No branch can bear fruit by itself; it must remain in the vine. Neither can you bear fruit unless you remain in me.

“I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing. If you do not remain in me, you are like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned." John 15:1-7

I realize this was a long(er) post but I think knowing the truth about these things is critical. "Paul" wields a LOT of authority even today, much to the same detriment to many today as to the Corinthians congregation back then. We're really not supposed to worry about the "sins" of others - really, which of us is WITHOUT sin and so able to cast a stone? If we have been shown mercy and forgiven, then it is upon us to SHOW mercy... and forgive. Does it matter is someone is "repentant"? Who are we to say who is and who is not? Paul was not repentant (and he had been instrumental in the MURDER of Christ's disciples); yet, he was still called and chosen. True, he had to "suffer" for his acts, but so do some of us today.

It is not up to us, however, the "cleanse" the Body of Christ - it is up the MOST HOLY One of Israel, JAH of Armies, the "Cultivator" of the Tree (of Life) for which that Body serves as "branches." When we take it upon ourselves to do such cleansing we are not only usurping HIS authority, but putting our selves in line to BE judged. NOT just for what we may be doing NOW... but ALL that we may have done before. Because that is how it works: you either forgive... and so BE forgiven... or you judge... and thereby put yourself BACK in line to BE judged.

What of someone who commits a crime "against the state"? Then such one might be handed over TO the state... for IT to judge him/her. If such one has only committed a crime (sin) against US... then we should follow the pattern stated by Christ recorded for us.

Even better, rather than concerning ourselves with the "transgression," we COULD allow LOVE... to let us SURPASS it. Because love is the Law's FULFILLMENT... and covers a MULTITUDE of transgressions. Ours... and those who may have "sinned" against us.

Sadly, we have a record that shows "Paul"... BEFORE he got this truth. Praise JAH, we also have a record that shows him afterward.

I hope this helps, dear one, truly.

Again, peace to you ALL!

YSSFS of Christ,

Shellama

Author:  Justmom [ Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

Thank you my sister for sharing what you have received.
A wonderful reminder. ;)

It helps me understand just how " normal" the apostles really were. The issues that went on THEN are some of the same things that go on NOW.
Having this recorded is a great learning lesson for all of us.

Thank you again
Justmom 8-)

Author:  GLTirebiter [ Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

Another point of view: while the Bible talks about God, it does so to teach us about ourselves: where we came from, where we are now, and where we should be headed.

Read the books in the collection called "the Bible" in the light of when they were written, and for whom, and in what kind of society. The books describe mankind's growing relationship to and knowledge of God as those societies grew and learned. In them, we see a slow progression (and an unsteady one, with many failings and regressions) starting from the simple faith of the patriarchs, through the idolatry, vanity and king-worship--this was the most violent era--beginning in Exodus and extending through the exile in Babylon, to a more spiritual faith of the post-exilic books (including the deutero-canonical books written shortly before the Lord's incarnation). In the Gospels the end point of the journey is finally in sight; Revelation provides a metaphoric picture of our other-worldly destination.

The story of a journey is just what it is: the travelogue of mankind following the path, "the way" to aligning our lives with God's will. It is not a story of an "Old Testament God" and a "New Testament God", but rather one of seeing Him more clearly as mankind moves closer to Him.

Author:  kassad84 [ Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bible books and issues of violence

Really, Many thanks guys, appreciate these insights, they're really invaluable to me in guiding Bible reading with a new "lens"..

Interesting point Shelby, it really is important to know the timeline when a text has been written, in this case the letters of Paul, which he may not have intended for public consumption anyway, only for those 1st century Christians. But unfortunately, laypeople like myself don't have the expertise to know these information, e.g. context, culture, greek word translation intricacies, and that fact that at the same time Paul himself was also maturing spiritually (!). This ultimately results in a lot of misinterpretations. Must be one of the reason why John, in writing his letters, chose to keep it as short as possible, and prefers verbal communication. 1 John 1:12, 3 John 1:13

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/