Loz wrote:
So, Char can hurl insults that are really reprehensible and nasty, and it's ok, cos we can't all be 'nice' all the time? I don't think so. Calling Shelby 'wicked' was worse that not being nice. Calling the body of Christ as was referenced, was beyond not being nice. Suggesting I was 'spiteful' was totally unacceptable. Where are the people hating attacks now, I wonder? Do you silent ones think that this stuff isn't hurtful? But if we react, we are reprimanded for attacking?
Char, you make me ashamed to be British by your example of our nation. Your adoration for the RCC has diminished your love for Christ and prompted you to attack lovers of Him, because their truth challenges that doctrine. Maybe you should examine this. But I won't hold my breath.
Loz x
Not that you're judgemental, or set yourself up to judge, Loz.
Perish the thought!
I have actually not done any of those things, with the exception that I tactlessly spoke the blunt truth on one.
You seem to lack any objectivity. It's a great limitation for you, and I suppose a disability. Lacking that basic ability you have no way to observe yourself, and so project your own feelings on the most apparent Aunt Sally, which on this forum happens to be me.
I am uncomfortable for you, yes, because I am not deceived, and I tend to tell it like it is. But though you can, and no doubt will continue to hurl accusations, as I've said before, it's merely water off a duck's back, as even a small child could see through it.
Love the way you waited till I'd turned in for the night, too bad I checked in one more time.