How easily people forget about Mendel as well
I believe Mendel corrected Darwin
| xjwsforChrist https://www.xjwsforchrist.com/ |
|
| Big Bang https://www.xjwsforchrist.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=733 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | YppuplleH [ Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Big Bang |
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaitre |
|
| Author: | tec [ Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
I think Burns pointed that info (or maybe Psac) on jwn one time, in a 'religion/christianity/belief in God has set the scientific world back with superstition' debate... or something along those lines. Gotta admit that I loved when he posted that, lol. Big grin from me when I saw it ; ) Peace, tammy |
|
| Author: | tec [ Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
Correction... I think that might have been a debate about how believers did not make good scientists. So even bigger grin, lol ; ) Peace, tammy |
|
| Author: | YppuplleH [ Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
How easily people forget about Mendel as well I believe Mendel corrected Darwin |
|
| Author: | tec [ Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
I don't know that one, Pup. Gonna look it up... Peace, tammy |
|
| Author: | Chariklo [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 12:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
He's been discussed here before..... viewtopic.php?f=20&t=68&p=730&hilit=Mendel#p730 I thought I'd posted on him on here but it must have been somewhere else |
|
| Author: | PSacramento [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
The list of Christian scientists is very long and distinguished. Like my Johnson. * sorry, couldn't help it, LOL * |
|
| Author: | tec [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
Ah, I vaguely remember that Char, thanks. And Paul...  (now... was I laughing with you, or AT you?  )Peace, tammy |
|
| Author: | YppuplleH [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
Short and to the point BAM!!! |
|
| Author: | tec [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
lol... i think this thread just might turn into a "science" measuring thread... in which case, I believe you gentlemen will be more interested than we ladies ; ) Peace, tammy |
|
| Author: | YppuplleH [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 9:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
http://youtu.be/JS1sGeWxbkc |
|
| Author: | tec [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 9:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
LOL... 2 minutes 35 seconds... |
|
| Author: | AGuest [ Thu Jun 20, 2013 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
Good stuff, dear Pup... and thanks for posting a link to the "Science/Religion" thread, dear Char (that WAS a good discussion, wasn't it!?)... and dear, dear P... DUDE! LOLOLOL! Peace to you all, and if we DO get into a science "measuring" contest, I MIGHT participate (the extent I "know" science, which is VERY little... and/or my Lord permits, in which case, don't be surprised if we are permitted to understand something "science" has currently overlooked - happens all the time!)... so I will ask the gentlemen to try and "keep it zipped"... in advanced - LOLOLOL! 1 minute 47 seconds... Peace to you all! YSSFS of Christ, Shellama |
|
| Author: | GLTirebiter [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
Further reading: For the interested non-scientist, Marcia Bartusiak's The Day We Found the Universe (Chapter 15) http://www.randomhouse.com/book/9306/the-day-we-found-the-universe-by-marcia-bartusiak/9780375424298/l For those with the background to decipher scientific journals, LeMaitre's article: A Homogenous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocities of Extra-Galactic Nubulae http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1931MNRAS..91..483L |
|
| Author: | AGuest [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 11:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Bang |
A quick question for any who might now/deign to opine (peace to you all!): If the universe is expanding (and I agree that it is)... "what" is it expanding "into"? The premise is that there was "nothing" to start with. If, howver, there was "nothing" (for the universe to expand into), LOGIC says that "it" (whatever "banged"/started things) would have destroyed itself, imploding IN on itself, having no ROOM to explode OUT. Yes? Yet, the theory is that the universe is expanding, getting larger as it were. How can it do so... if there is no ROOM... WITHIN which to do so? Again, I agree that it is expanding. I am just curious as to how some believe it is expanding "into nothing." Because that is not my understanding as to "what" it is expanding "into." Anyone? Again, peace to you, all! A slave of Christ, Shellama |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|